• THIS IS THE 25th ANNIVERSARY YEAR FOR THE LES PAUL FORUM! PLEASE CELEBRATE WITH US AND SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO KEEP US GOING! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and recently moved to a new hosting platform. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!
  • WE HAVE MOVED THE LES PAUL FORUM TO A NEW HOSTING PROVIDER! Let us know how it is going! Many thanks, Mike Slubowski, Admin
  • Please support our Les Paul Forum Sponsors with your business - Gary's Classic Guitars, Wildwood Guitars, Chicago Music Exchange, Reverb.com, Throbak.com and True Vintage Guitar. From personal experience doing business with all of them, they are first class organizations. Thank you!

A fun comparison (tube vs. modeller)

metropolis

Active member
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
447
I spent Monday in a rehearsal room with a friend playing through some Rush covers, and set up three different amps for a direct comparison. Left to right in the photo we have a Marshall Club & Country (4140) 2x12 100w combo, a Kemper (which I ran through both the cab and the PA) and a Mesa Boogie Studio .22+

2yYMg9bl.jpg


rZCT6pQl.jpg


Most importantly based on what we were playing the Marshall was the hero of the day - it is the amp Alex Lifeson used on Moving Pictures, Signals, Grace Under Pressure and maybe even a few later albums. It absolutely nails the tones of those songs, particularly with the right pedals (like lots of chorus and flanger). I used the Kemper for the earlier period Hiwatt and Fender Super Reverb tones. The Boogie came along because we're both John Petrucci fans and I wanted an excuse to crank it in a room.

In terms of conclusions...

The Marshall was a beast - filled the room with sound, cut through brilliantly and felt great to play. The EQ was largely useless but it didn't matter because it sounded great. Downsides to that are it weighs a ton and is 45 years old so may not be the most reliable amp to use (although I just had it put through a major service).

The Kemper couldn't compete with the power the Marshall put out, even with the PA to support. The flexibility and effects were a huge benefit, but it doesn't do the tube amp thing in the room.

The Boogie was tighter and more focused than the Marshall, and considering it is only 20 watts had a scary amount of volume on tap - it doesn't really need to be pushed quite so much because it is so mid-focused.

If I was turning up to a random rehearsal or bar gig without guaranteeing a good PA I'd use one of the tube amps - likely the Boogie because it's compact and punchy. If I am playing an need a silent stage or have a very good PA in a decent venue the Kemper is easier to use and ultimately will sound just as good through FOH (maybe better).
 
Top