• THIS IS THE 25th ANNIVERSARY YEAR FOR THE LES PAUL FORUM! PLEASE CELEBRATE WITH US AND SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO KEEP US GOING! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and recently moved to a new hosting platform. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!
  • WE HAVE MOVED THE LES PAUL FORUM TO A NEW HOSTING PROVIDER! Let us know how it is going! Many thanks, Mike Slubowski, Admin
  • Please support our Les Paul Forum Sponsors with your business - Gary's Classic Guitars, Wildwood Guitars, Chicago Music Exchange, Reverb.com, Throbak.com and True Vintage Guitar. From personal experience doing business with all of them, they are first class organizations. Thank you!

Epiphone takes another swing...

Wound_Up

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
71
I don't have anything against Laurel, I have a couple of MIC Epiphones that have them, and they sound fine. They don't look the same as rosewood, though.

I would hope laurel doesn't look the same as rosewood. That's why its laurel and not rosewood. If it looked like rosewood, it likely wouldn't be laurel. It'd be rosewood. Pretty sure that's why they have different names. 🤷
 

garywright

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
16,006
I would hope laurel doesn't look the same as rosewood. That's why its laurel and not rosewood. If it looked like rosewood, it likely wouldn't be laurel. It'd be rosewood. Pretty sure that's why they have different names. 🤷
I would suspect laurel boards resembling very dark rosewood have been stained ?
 
Top